-
-
Natale Dankotuwage*
-
-
Jothi Shanmugam*
Recently, the Globe & Mail’s Campbell Clark reported on how Prime Minister Harper was causing consternation among his fellow Commonwealth leaders because of his government’s increasing willingness to criticize the human rights record of the government of Sri Lanka [“Harper’s Stand on Sri Lanka is Not Just Cricket,” Thursday, Oct. 27, 2011]. A few weeks earlier, Mr. Campbell had reported that Mr. Harper had threatened to “boycott the 2013 Commonwealth summit in Sri Lanka if that government doesn’t show accountability for human-rights abuses and take steps to reconcile with the Tamil minority (“In policy shift, Stephen Harper presses Sri Lanka on human rights”, Thursday, Sept. 29, 2011).
As Mr. Clark noted at the time, the Canadian government’s new boldness in criticizing Sri Lanka’s tainted human rights record reflected “a mix of diaspora politics and foreign-policy principles [that] will have implications abroad and at home with a long-frustrated Tamil-Canadian community.” A question that arises, however, is whether “diaspora politics” and “Canadian foreign-policy principles” must necessarily exist in tension with one another, or whether they might align into one, integrated whole.
The term “diaspora politics” actually takes on multiple meanings where Canadians of Sri Lankan background are concerned. On the one hand, it can refer to the complex web of intra-community dynamics and issue-specific alliances and divisions that exist within and across the broader Sri Lankan community. On the other hand, it can simply refer to the significant size and increasing degree of political sophistication and participation by the Sri Lankan diaspora in the Canadian political system. Any political party would be naïve not to pay heed to so large and so politicized a group of Canadians.
With a population of 200,000 or more, those in Canada’s Tamil community are by far the largest diaspora group in Canada with its origins in Sri Lanka. A fraction of that number of Canadians is of Sinhalese background. By contrast, in Sri Lanka itself, Tamils represent around only 20% of the population, with the majority Sinhala community dominating the country’s government, military, and public institutions.
As a result of the disproportionate size of the Tamil community within Canada’s Sri Lankan diaspora, it is often assumed that “diaspora politics” involve paying specific heed to the concerns expressed by those of Tamil background exclusively, which – it is also assumed – are irreconcilable with those of Sinhalese or other backgrounds.
However, as young women of Sri Lankan background – one Tamil, the other Sinhalese – we would like to suggest a re-thinking of those assumptions.
We both readily acknowledge that relations among the various communities of Sri Lanka who now call Canada home understandably intensified during the final days of the Sri Lankan civil war in 2009. At the time, the prospect for reconciliation between Canadians of Tamil background and those from Sinhalese or Muslim Sri Lankan backgrounds seemed unfathomable. The Tamil community was loud and unrelenting in its call for the Canadian government to respond to what they perceived as a genocide against the Tamil people by the Sinhala-dominated government in Sri Lanka. Defenders of the government of Sri Lanka, though smaller in number, publicly decried the acts of terrorism perpetrated against civilian targets in Sri Lanka by the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (“Tamil Tigers”). Tensions heightened with stories of inter-community violence in suburban Toronto, the provocative use by some street protesters of the Tamil Tiger flag, and the distribution of hate messages in all directions using social media tools.
During this time, we and a small group of Tamil, Sinhalese and Muslim youth came together seeking to find common, Canadian ground among our communities. Our goal was to engage in constructive dialogue focused on ways to promote reconciliation and development in Sri Lanka and help rebuild the country where many of us and our parents had been born. Yet when we approached own community organizations to undertake such a project, we were turned down and advised to drop the plan for our own safety.
Fortunately, through the efforts of The Mosaic Institute, we ultimately succeeded in launching a two-year “Young Canadians’ Peace Dialogue on Sri Lanka” in the summer of 2009.
After spending several months drafting a statement of “Guiding Values” which would set the rules of engagement for our future public discussions, we assembled about 100 like-minded young Canadians of Tamil, Sinhalese and Muslim Sri Lankan background to learn about each other and to try and agree on a constructive course forward both for our relationships here in Canada, and for our families still living in Sri Lanka. Our views of the geopolitics of Sri Lanka were at times widely divergent, but we were all convinced that reconciliation between our communities here in Canada was imperative if we as Canadians wanted to have the credibility to promote peace, pluralism and democracy for all the people of Sri Lanka.
As participants, we openly shared experiences of loss, grievances, and hope for the future of a better Sri Lanka for all people. Some of us also participated in meetings with senior Canadian and Sri Lankan civil servants, diplomats, and academics, in order to better understand their different perspectives on the challenges to achieving meaningful reconciliation in Sri Lanka.
Our Peace Dialogue revealed to us and to all our fellow participants that the pursuit for reconciliation and the strengthening of true democracy in Sri Lanka are not the exclusive domain of Canadians with Tamil backgrounds. These concerns are shared by many of those of Sinhalese, Muslim or other ethnocultural backgrounds. Moreover, amongst these critically engaged youth, violence and extremism were wholeheartedly rejected in favour of a more inclusive and peaceful approach to achieving political change in Sri Lanka.
In the end, we drafted and submitted a set of policy recommendations to the Governments of both Canada and Sri Lanka. We also formed ourselves into an ongoing fundraising organization called Build Change (www.buildchange.ca), under whose banner we are now working with the Canadian Rotarian Water Foundation to help build residential water wells for the families of internally displaced persons (IDPs) in the Vanni region of northeastern Sri Lanka. With the encouragement of Canada’s Department of Foreign Affairs, a “Reconciliation Tour” of Sri Lanka is also in the planning stage.
In sum, through our Peace Dialogue, we have been engaging in a new kind of “diaspora politics” that are wholly consistent with Canada’s foreign policy principles. Rather than holding on to entrenched views imported from the country that our parents had left for the promise of a better life in Canada, we have been working together to try and identify common strategies for supporting all the people of Sri Lanka in their efforts to rebuild their country. In that effort, we have been inspired by the example of peace-focused civil society organizations in Sri Lanka and by officials of Canada’s own Department of Foreign Affairs to help advance a vision of peace and pluralism for Sri Lanka that is reflective of the best of Canada’s core values.
Given our close connections back to the people of Sri Lanka and our shared commitment to living out such values, the diverse members of our community here in Canada –Tamils, Sinhalese, Muslims and others among them – have a tremendous opportunity to demonstrate to the Government and people of Sri Lanka how reconciliation can be achieved and pluralism can be practiced.
* Jothi Shanmugam is a senior undergraduate student of Peace & Conflict Studies and Criminology at the University of Toronto and a former Mosaic Intern. Natale Dankotuwage is a senior undergraduate student of Political Science at the University of Toronto. Both have served on the Steering Committee of the “Young Canadians’ Peace Dialogue on Sri Lanka”, convened by the Mosaic Institute in partnership with the Trudeau Centre for Peace & Conflict Studies at the Munk School for Global Affairs.